Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Enquiry to Minister of Justice - 19 Feb 2013

TO: Minister of Justice And Constitutional Development

RE: Clarification about the registration of REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA as a corporation
Dear Minister.

On the 18th January 2013, I sent the first request to the Minister of Arts & Culture, for clarification regarding the registration of the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA as a corporation on the US Securities Exchange. I requested that our questions be answered in SEVEN days. On the 30th of January 2013, I followed my original enquiry with another request, which was copied to the office of the President, allowing the minister a further FIVE days to respond to our enquiry. To date, 19 Feb 2013, we have not received a response. This is my THIRD attempt to shed light on the questions posed.
Please see the original emails below and respond to our questions within SEVEN days from date of this communication.

In our effort to bring absolute freedom and liberty to all the people of South Africa, especially on the economic front, it has come to our attention that our country “REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA” is registered as a corporation on the US Securities Exchange, among other well recognised corporations like Anglo American, Old Mutual, ABSA and Standard Bank. Please click on the following link to verify this: http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=south+africa&match=contains&action=getcompany

We need urgent information and answers to the following questions to be able to accurately advise the people of South African about their rights and their relationship to this corporation.

  1. We require to view, or to obtain a certified copy of the original registration document, founding statement and title deed of this corporation called REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA.
  2. Who authorised that the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA was to be registered as such and why?
  3. Who is the CEO of this corporation?
  4. Who is the accounting officer and what financial statement does it produce?
  5. What are the assets of this corporation?
  6. Are these assets traded by this corporation – if so, how and where, and who is accountable for trading these assets?
  7. Who are the shareholders of the corporation and how are they appointed?
  8. What is the relationship of the people of South Africa to this corporation called REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA.
  9. Is there any agreement between the people and/or citizens of South Africa and the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA? If so, where are those agreements and when were they entered into?
  10. Do the people of South Africa have any obligations to this corporation, and if so do they have the right to renounce such obligation?
  11. Since our BILL OF RIGHTS and our constitution, as well as the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights strictly forbids any form of slavery or forced servitude, what rights do the people who live in the land referred to as South Africa have, to cut all their ties and any responsibility to this corporation that they did not even know existed?
  12. What is the relationship between this corporation called THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA and the GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA?

We require your urgent attention and response to this within 7 (seven) days, as this matter has severe implications to the liberties and economic freedoms of all the people who live in this land, called South Africa.

In Pure Truth
Michael of the family Tellinger
Founder of UBUNTU Party and UBUNTU Liberation Movement
Fax: 086 600 6420
All rights reserved - Non Assumpsit

Monday, 18 February 2013

Banks Hide Crimes Behind Laws That Protect Them

This is the response I received from the Legal Counsel for the Registrar of Banks, Rene van Wyk at the Reserve Bank, to an enquiry I sent on the 6th Feb 2013, requesting answers to a host of questions regarding disclosure on SECURITISATION. My original email can be seen on this page from activity on the 6th Feb 2013.

Please share this letter on behalf of Rene van Wyk, the Registrar of Banks, with everyone.

It constitutes a complete desecration of all our rights – especially our right to access to information on matters that have destroyed millions of peoples’ lives.

It is absolutely clear from the response, and there can be no more doubt that the banks are protected by the law and the courts – this is how they get away with fraud and other criminal activity without any repercussions. After thousands and thousands of cases against ordinary hardworking people, the banks always seem to win – or they withdraw if they feel that they have been cornered. There is something fundamentally wrong with this equation.

The so-called secrecy clause, Sec. 33 of the South African Reserve Bank Act, as outlined by the Registrar of Banks, protects the banks and they do not have to answer any questions or disclose any information that may incriminate them.

It will take a special and collective effort from the people of South Africa to expose this to everyone and cause this Act to be pronounced unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court.

Michael of the family Tellinger
All rights reserved - Non Assumpsit

 This is a converted letter from PDF format with no changes made! To read the original PDF please Click here

South African Reserve Bank

Legal Services Department
2013-01-14                                                                                          Ref.  10/5/5/6

Mr Michael Tellinger
E-mail:  contact@ubuntuparty. org.za

Dear Mr Tellinger,
Disclosure of Securitisation

We refer to your e-mail letter dated 6 February 2013 addressed to Mr Rene van Wyk, Registrar of Banks.

Before I address your enquiries in particular, permit me to comment on securitization in general.

The concept of securitization, a process which involves the pooling and repackaging of cash-flow producing financial assets into securities for sale to investors, constitutes an internationally recognized and established structured finance process. In this country, securitization schemes are authorized and regulated by the Office for Banks in terms of regulations (currently published in Government Gazette No. 30628 dated 1 January 2008 - "Security Regulations") issued in terms of the Banks Act, 1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990). All securitization schemes, irrespective of whether they originate from a bank or non-bank, are  required to  comply with the Security Regulations, which, inter  alia,  regulate: the corporate status, ownership and control of the issuer of notes; requirements in respect of the transfer or true sale of assets from the originator to the issuer; the provision of credit enhancement and liquidity facilities and disclosure.

The questions listed in your aforementioned  letter relate to the operation of banks and the fulfillment of reporting requirements to the Registrar of Banks in terms of the Banks Act. The South African Reserve Bank is subject to the South African Reserve Bank Act, 1989 (Act 90 of 1989) ("the Act").
Section 33 of the Act provides as follows:

"33.  Preservation of secrecy- (1) No director, officer or employee of the Bank, and no officer in the Department of Finance, shall disclose to any person, except to the Minister or the Director-General: Finance or for the purpose of the performance of his or her duties or the exercise of his or her functions or when required to do so before a court of law or under any law -

(a)  any information relating to the affairs of-
(i)  the Bank;
(ii)   a shareholder of the Bank; or
(iii)  a client of the Bank,
acquired in the performance of his or her duties or the exercise of his or her functions; or

(b)   any  other  information acquired by  him  or  her  in  the course  of his  or  her participation in the activities of the Bank,
except,  in  the case  of  information referred to in paragraph (a)(iii), with the written consent of the Minister and the Governor, after consultation with the client concerned.

(1A)  The provisions of subsection (1) shall not be construed as preventing any director, 'officer or employee of the Bank who is responsible for exercising any power or performing any function or duty under the Exchange Control Regulations, 1961, issued in terms of  section  9 of the Currency and Exchanges Act, 1933 (Act No. 9 of 1933), from disclosing to the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service any information as may be required for purposes of exercising any power or performing any function or duty in terms of any Act administered by the Commissioner.

(2)  No person shall disclose to any other person any information contained in any written communication which is in any manner marked as confidential or secret and which has been addressed by the Bank to any person or which has been addressed by any person to the Bank, except -

(a)  for the purposes of the performance of his duties or the exercise of his powers in terms of any law or when required to do so before a court of law; or

(b)   with  the  written  consent  of  both  the  sender  and  the  recipient  of  that communication."

In light of the provisions of the aforesaid section 33 we are unable to provide you with the requested information.

We trust that you will appreciate our position herein. You are of course entitled to follow the formal processes available to you in accordance with the Promotion of Access to Information Act should you wish to do so.

Yours sincerely

Dr JJ De Jager
General Counsel
Legal Services Department

Sunday, 10 February 2013

All Wars Are Banksters' Wars

This is for those who still cannot believe that the bankers have been controlling the world for a long long time. Michael Rivero has written an incredible article about the control and manipulation of global politics by the banksters - especially in the past 300 years, leading up to the financial slavery we find ourselves in today.
He also compiled an incredible documentary on this subject with unimaginable quotes by past and present politicians and bankers. 

I urge you to watch this 45 min. documentary and share it with everyone who is still a sceptic.
To read the full article go to Michael's website - www.whatreallyhappened.com

Saturday, 9 February 2013

The World Is A Trading Post of STUFF

Slowly but surely, our entire planet has been turned into an unbearable trading post. Try to visualise all the millions of shops, kiosks, markets, stock exchanges, street vendors, restaurants, shopping malls, fast food outlets, etc... all with their shelves loaded with STUFF, trying to sell their STUFF to passers-by.
Millions of shopkeepers and their employees waste their lives away waiting for customers to come in and buy something.
Millions of companies spend insane amounts of time, money and creative energy to design and manufacture STUFF that they think people will want to buy. This is extended into every industry like the hospitality industries selling hotel rooms and holidays, scrumptious plates of food – WHY?
Because the human slaves that work all year like worker ants deserve to take a break at the end of the year to spend all that MONEY that have been working so hard for – to lie on a beach on some exotic island to make them feel better about themselves.
What has happened to us?
We have become a planet of slaves that manufacture more and more STUFF every month for other slaves to buy and consume. STUFF we do not need nor want, but it gets made in any case, with more colourful gadgets, bells and whistles, because the dumb slaves have become addicted to the gadgets.
The slaves think that they have advanced technology in their hands but instead, they only have more tools of control and tools of enslavement that will allow the slaves to become more productive in delivering to the masters and keep them occupied with the new gadgets, doing stupid mindless things so that they don’t have time to contemplate their humanness – who they are as immortal souls, and elevate their levels of consciousness.
It is always a NEW & IMPROVED version of the same STUFF, and it lures billions of people every month to buy this stuff with MONEY that they have to slave away for and in most cases don’t even have. It is an insane system – wake up and smell your brain burning.
Billions of people buy billions of things every day that they don’t really need – but this is a state of hypnotic numbness that we have been lured into so that we can continue to buy more stuff, so that we, the slaves, keep rewarding ourselves with all this glitter and stuff.
All this to keep us preoccupied and not realise that we are being conned by those who control the flow of money. This is the big secret – nothing else really matters. The slaves have to stay as busy as they can not to allow them time to think for themselves. And so this thing called “business” is born.
We were all born into this system where global business and businessmen are revered for what they do, and how much money they make. In reality it is the great deception that has entrapped the world.
In the meantime the planet is being mined by these businesses, more than ever before in our entire history. We yank every possible mineral and substance out of the ground, not because we really need it, but mostly so that more stuff can be manufactured and traded so that those who control the flow of money can sell the unsuspecting humans more STUFF they don’t really need. Most of the stuff we buy, we discard within a few minutes or in the next few years. Just think about it – don’t just dismiss this statement.
This just gets the slaves into more debt that they can never repay, and so the slaves have to work for the rest of their lives paying off more and more debt while consuming more and more stuff thinking that they are making good progress in life because the television tells them so.
All these ignorant human slaves just keep the wheels of industry turning, and this keeps the flow of money increasing and enslaving us more and more. The incredible waste of people power and resources and materials that goes into keeping this monster alive is almost unimaginable.
IT HAS TO STOP – We have to free ourselves from this insanity.
Most people cannot imagine a way out of this mess – and yet there is a very simple way out. It is so simple that every ounce of educated logic in our bones shouts at us that it cannot possibly be so simple. Because our minds and hearts and souls have been poisoned so deeply by the controllers of money, that we cannot see the simple solutions.
Money is the obstacle to all progress and the cause of all the strife on EARTH. So the answer is quite simple – REMOVE THE MONEY – suddenly all the madness dissolves almost immediately.
The UBUNTU Contributionism model allows for all things to be provided without money to all those who need to make the stuff that is really needed by the people. So that everything is possible and available at any time to those who make and manufacture things.
So, instead of making and marketing STUFF to unsuspecting citizens, we should be creating products and things that the people need to firstly survive, then to prosper and then to achieve great things on all levels of society. It is quite simple actually – The UBUNTU Contributionism model provides the plan and blueprint for such a society.
Just imagine that all those shopkeepers, traders, vendors and salesmen were not trying to sell stuff to people that they don’t really need, but rather acted as providers of things, and suppliers of services that communities need to reach their highest potential.
Just imagine all the factories and manufacturers, and everyone who creates anything,  like cars, computers, nail clippers, clothing, shoes, beds, bricks, milk, eggs, bread, energy devices, and everything communities need – were actually making it specifically for the communities that needed those items.
Imagine if all these manufacturers were supplying scientists with things they needed to make great new breakthroughs. Our world will be a place of pure utopia. A true heaven on Earth that we have been denied of.
I know that I am really simplifying it, but everything should be simple as opposed to the complex, unworkable system we have today. It has to be presented simply, to allow people to start thinking about it and not shy away, as we have been doing for far too long.
This is why small communities under a well integrated Contributionism system will flourish in abundance. They will have everything they need and keep improving the lives of their people. Arts and culture will explode and consciousness will skyrocket with the freeing up of people’s minds.
It is not rocket science to establish what communities need and have it made or manufactured or produced for the community.
Let’s look at some basic examples. If there are 1000 people in the community, how many nail clippers do they need? How much shampoo do they use monthly? How much butter do they need and how many litres of milk do they use daily, and how much bread do they eat? 
How many beds do we need in the community – and why is hand-spun cotton so expensive while thousands sit idly around looking for jobs? We should all be sleeping on the finest cotton sheets – because there are enough people to grow the cotton and spin the cotton.
Among those who sit idly wasting their lives away, are technologists and computer geeks. To place a computer into each household and into each factory and office is not an insurmountable problem.
Can you see the obvious approach to this STUFF problem?
The competition between brands remains an incurable disease in a capitalist society – we cannot stop it and more manufacturers make more brands as the competition expands.
But if money is no hurdle, then brands will not compete – we will transform from competition to cooperation. Where everyone will share the latest know-how and scientific technology to make the best possible products for the greatest benefit of the people. We will dissolve our EGO and GREED and lose the need for new shiny metal and bells and whistles.
Let us turn the factories and traders into providers, suppliers and distributors rather than just salesmen and vendors who want to make money. Let them become the barometers of what society needs and the catalysts to start the production. They can play a critical role in the flow of energy through the UBUNTU communities.

Please watch this wonderful video clip called “The Story of Stuff”  - 20 min which explains the insanity of what we are doing while pointing out the reasons behind it. 
Keep exploring and join the UBUNTU Liberation Movement – www.ubuntuparty.org.za
Michael of the family Tellinger 
8 January 2011

Thursday, 7 February 2013

More Evidence of Countries Registered as Corporations

Almost ALL Countries are listed on the US STOCK EXCHANGE (SECURITIES EXCHANGE)

Some are cleverly listed on other stock exchanges. Here are more results of many more countries listed as CORPORATIONS - this makes the people their stock and property. Our birth certificates are the stock certificates that are being traded on the stock markets.
It is time to snap out of our hypnotic state of ignorance and share this with everyone. The whole world is enslaved by those who run the corporations - the banking elite families. Only we can stop the continued chain of enslavement - our children have no future - they are property of the corporations and absolute slaves to the system - just like we are. How are you going to explain this to your children?

"No one is more enslaved than those who believe they are free." Goethe

Click here to see the listings on the actual US Securities Website - seeing is believeing.

EDGAR Search Results
Company Search »
Companies for SIC 8888 - FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
Click on CIK to view company filings
Items 1 - 40
CIK    Company    State/Country
0000311669    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK    R6
0001016472    CITY OF NAPLES    DE
formerly: DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN (filings through 2008-09-29)    M0
formerly: EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP (filings through 2002-06-07)    DC
0000035946    FINLAND REPUBLIC OF    DC
0001556421    FMS WERTMANAGEMENT    2M
0001179453    GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE    DC
0001163395    GOVERNMENT OF JAMICA    NY
0000931106    HELLENIC REPUBLIC    NY
0000889414    HUNGARY
formerly: REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY (filings through 2011-11-25)    NY
0000052749    ISRAEL STATE OF    NY
0000052782    ITALY REPUBLIC OF    L6
0000053078    JAMAICA GOVERNMENT OF    L8
0000837056    JAPAN    NY
0001551322    Japan Bank for International Cooperation    M0
0000053190    JAPAN DEVELOPMENT BANK    M0
0001109604    Japan Finance Corp
formerly: JAPAN BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION (filings through 2008-09-29)    M0
formerly: JAPAN FINANCE CORP FOR MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISES (filings through 2008-09-29)    M0
0000821533    KfW
formerly: KREDITANSTALT FUER WIEDERAUFBAU (filings through 2004-11-12)
KREDITANSTALT FUR WIEDERAUFBAU (filings through 2002-10-11)    2M
0001483135    KOREA FINANCE Corp    M5
0001027457    NATIONAL POWER CORP    R6
0000357024    NORDIC INVESTMENT BANK    H9
0000074615    ONTARIO PROVINCE OF    A6
0000076027    PANAMA REPUBLIC OF    DC
Items 41 - 60
CIK    Company    State/Country
0000077694    PERU REPUBLIC OF    NY
0000722803    QUEBEC    A8
0001191980    REGION OF LOMBARDY    DE
0000019957    REPUBLIC OF CHILE
formerly: CHILE REPUBLIC OF (filings through 2002-11-01)    F3
0000917142    REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA    NY
0000873465    REPUBLIC OF KOREA    M5
0000911076    REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL    DC
formerly: SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF (filings through 2002-04-10)    DC
0000869687    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY    NY
0000225913    SWEDEN KINGDOM OF    V7

USA is a Corporation - Congressman West - Florida

US Congressman Allen West from Florida leaks that the USA is a corporation and the president is the CEO of this coporation called UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Small Free Energy Device - Perpetual Motion?

I have not tested this, since it is not easy to find monopole magnets, but if anyone can replicate this, please let us and everyone else know as a matter of urgency.
If we can do this on a small scale - we can do it on a larger scale and run our homes on a few larger versions of this tiny energy device.



Michael of the family Tellinger

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Urgent Request For Disclosure To Registrar of Banks

TO: The Registrar of Banks – Pretoria, South Africa                          6 February 2013


Mr Rene van Wyk


The Ubuntu Party is a duly registered political party in accordance with the IEC and confirmed in terms of the Electoral Commission Act of 1996 as can be confirmed at : http://www.elections.org.za/content/Pages/Registered_Parties/Registered

It has come to our attention that the banks have been refusing to answer simple questions to thousands of people, regarding the highly secretive practice of SECURITISATION as contained in Rule 35 read with the Section 1, definition of ‘business of a bank’ of the Bank Act.

The banks and the Ombudsman For Banking Services (OBS) have bluntly refused to answer questions regarding securitisation, posed by the party itself, thousands of our members and those of other NPO’s and interest groups.

It is our understanding that as from the initial securitisation transactions as far back as 1998 no proper record had been kept by the banks that, inter alia, includes which of the banks’ client’s loans had been securitised.
The National Credit Act, Sec 69(4) requires that all credit agreements that have been sold or traded are to be registered with the National Credit Regulator.
Furthermore, we are also to understand that as of November 2007, under which the National Credit Act became operative, the banks had not registered any securitisation transactions with the National Credit Regulator.
It appears to us that the banks are hiding behind the Bank Act and they rely on ‘non-disclosure’ provided for in the same act. This is completely unacceptable in a free and democratic society whose highest law is enshrined in its Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It is also apparent that the banks are consciously hiding activities that could be interpreted as fraudulent and therefore of a possible criminal nature.
This is an extremely serious matter that has affected the lives of millions of South Africans. For the benefit of all the people of South Africa and in the interest of justice and complete transparency we request that you respond within 7 (seven) days to the following questions.

  1. Do South African banks participate in a process called securitisation in any way?
  2. Do the banks have to comply with the National Credit Act, Sec 69(4) to register sales and transfers of credit agreements?
  3. If NOT - Why not?
  4. State the reasons why South African Banks are not obliged to disclose to the public the content of a bundled securitisation transaction.
  5. According to the BASA website, South African banks are securitising loans at a rate of about R30 billion per month. Please confirm if this is reasonably accurate.
  6. Please provide us with accurate figures of monthly securitisation amounts for all the banks, since this is not always easily obtainable.
  7. Explain how the legal standing of people’s loans would be effected if their loans have been securitised?
  8. Does a consumer have the right to know if their loan has been securitised?
  9. What kind of loans are securitised by South African banks? As in: home loans, vehicle loans, credit cards or other? Please give details.
  10. Please explain how our members can trace the securitisation of their loans?
  11. Prior to, or during the operation of the National Credit Act, did the banks apply for an exception, which would allow them to use securitisation as an alternative source of funding?
  12. If so, how did they apply, when and to whom - and what was the outcome?
  13. When a loan/bond/note is sold to a third party in securitisation, must that third party be registered in terms of the National Credit Act? If not, explain why not?
  14. When a loan/bond/note, is sold through the process of securitisation, who becomes the rightful owner and/or holder of the loan/bond/note?
  15. When a loan/bond/note, is sold by a bank through the process of securitisation, does the bank retain locus standi on a property attached to the loan?
  16. What is the official position of the Registrar of Banks with regards to the effect of securitisation on the South African economy?
I await your urgent response.

in Pure Truth

Michael of the family Tellinger
Chair Person & Founder
All rights reserved - without prejudice - non assumpsit.
Fax: 086 600 6420

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

National Credit Regulator - Urgent Response Required


5 February 2013

TO: The Executive Officer -  National Credit Regulator

In our effort to bring absolute freedom and liberty to all the people of South Africa, especially on the economic front, it has come to our attention that the banks have been refusing to answer simple questions to thousands of our members, regarding the highly secretive practice of SECURITISATION.
The National Credit Regulator is obliged to investigate complaints made by the public (Chapter 8 of the National Credit Act, 34 of 2005). Furthermore, the National Credit Act, Sec 69(4) requires that all credit agreements that have been sold or traded are to be registered with the National Credit Regulator.

For the benefit of all the people of South Africa and in the interest of justice and complete transparency we urge you to respond within 7 (seven) days to the following questions.
  1. Do the banks comply with the above legislation?
  2. Is the NCR aware of a process of called “securitisation?”
  3. In light of the attached documents, please explain how the legal standing of people’s loans would be effected if the loans have been securitised?
  4. According to the BASA website, South African banks are securitising loans at a rate of about R30 billion per month. Please confirm if this is reasonably accurate – and if not, please provide us with accurate figures?
  5. State the official position of the NCR with regards to the effect of securitisation on the South African economy?
  6. Would a debt counsellor be affected by securitisation?
  7. Does a consumer have the right to know if their loan has been securitised?
  8. What kind of loans are securitised by South African banks? As in: home loans, vehicle loans, credit cards or other? Please give details.
  9. Please explain how our members can trace the securitisation of their loans?
  10. Prior to, or during the operation of the National Credit Act, did the banks apply for an exception to use securitisation as an alternative source of funding? If so, how and when and to whom?
  11. When a loan is sold on to a third party in securitisation, must that third party be registered in terms of the National Credit Act? If not, can you explain why not?
  12. When a loan/bond/note, is sold through the process of securitisation, who becomes the rightful owner or holder of the note?

Kindly refer to the attached documents and also note the following two articles that appeared in The Business Report last week: http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/newera-takes-heart-at-us-ruling-on-securitisation-1.1460123 and http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/absa-drags-feet-in-securitisation-suit-1.1462324.

These articles and references show that not only is the business model of securitisation being declared illegal in the United States, but it is also an economically devastating practice.

I await your urgent response.
in Pure Truth

Michael of the family Tellinger
Founder UBUNTU Party
All rights reserved - without prejudice - non assumpsit.
Fax: 086 600 6420

Friday, 1 February 2013

We Are Not Alone - European Space Agency

Phobos, the Martian moon is artificial claims European Space Agency

The prestigious European Space Agency (ESA) has declared Phobos, the mysterious Martian moon, to be artificial. At least one-third of it is hollow and its origin is not natural, but alien in nature. The ESA is Europe's counterpart to NASA. Could this revelation motivate NASA to release the secrets it is harbouring? Don't count on it… because if its artificial an alien civilization must have put it there.

Phobos was first believed to be artificial by famous astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky when he calculated the orbital motion of the Martian satellite Phobos. He came to the inescapable conclusion that the Martian moon is artificial and hollow - basically a titanic spaceship.

Russian astronomer, Dr. Cherman Struve, spent months calculating the two Martian moons' orbits with extreme accuracy during the early 20th Century. Studying the astronomer's notes, Shklovsky realized as the years progressed into decades, that Phobos's orbital velocity and position no longer matched Struve's mathematically predicted position.

After lengthy study of the tidal, gravitic, and magnetic forces, Shklovsky came to the firm conclusion that, “ No natural causes could account for the origins of the two odd moons or their bizarre behavior, particularly that exhibited by Phobos. The moons were artificial. Someone or something built them.

During an interview about the mysterious Martian moon Shklovsky explained: "There's only one way in which the requirements of coherence, constancy of shape of Phobos, and its extremely small average density can be reconciled. We must assume that Phobos is a hollow, empty body, resembling an empty tin can."

For decades most of mainstream science ignored Shklovsky's breakthrough work, until the ESA began to take a closer look at the odd little moon.

ESA study declares Phobos not natural.
The ESA study abstract that appeared in the peer-reviewed Geophysical Research Letters reveals that Phobos is not what many astrophysicists and astronomers believed for generations: a captured asteroid.

"We report independent results from two subgroups of the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) team who independently analyzed Mars Express (MEX) radio tracking data for the purpose of determining consistently the gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the MEX spacecraft, and hence the mass of Phobos. New values for the gravitational parameter (GM=0.7127 ± 0.0021 x 10-³ km³/s²) and density of Phobos (1876 ± 20 kg/m³) provide meaningful new constraints on the corresponding range of the body's porosity (30% ± 5%), provide a basis for improved interpretation of the internal structure. We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely contains large voids. When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid."

Casey Kazan writes in ESA: Mars Moon Phobos 'Artificial,' that "…the official ESA Phobos website contained explicit scientific data, from multiple perspectives, which strongly 'supported the idea that this is what radar echoes would look like, coming back from inside 'a huge…geometric… hollow spaceship'. In fact, they were the primary source of the decidedly 'internal, 3-D geometric-looking' radar signature. The concurrence of all three of these independent Mars Express experiments- imaging, internal mass distribution, (tracking) and internal radar imaging, now agreed that the interior of Phobos is partially hollow with internal, geometric 'voids' inside it. Meaning that Phobos is artificial."

In other words, Phobos is not a natural satellite, is not a "captured asteroid," and is hollow. This is exactly what Dr. Shklovsky found back in the 1960s. Phobos was artificially constructed and placed into Martian orbit by...who?
(Taken from a weekly report by George A. Filer - MUFON Director)