Wednesday, 21 November 2012

UBUNTU Party Launches in Johannesburg & Cape Town

This is a reminder of the PUBLIC meetings and launch of the UBUNTU Party in Johannesburg & Cape Town.
These events are open to everyone - no entrance fee - tell everyone and let us make these events historic events in the process of liberating South Africa from economic slavery.

JOHANNESBURG - Muldersdrift - Bergvallei Estates
DATE: Sunday - 25 November 2012
TIME: 2pm – 5pm
VENUE:  Bergvallei Estates, Muldersdrift, just off the N14
GPS:      S26 degrees 03 minutes 14.1 seconds        E027 degrees 50 minutes 16.9 seconds
Please note that Bergvallei is on the R28/N14 and there is thus a service road  - it is not a slipway, but you turn off onto the service road directly off of the highway, almost immediately after you have seen the entrance to Bergvallei (prominent white and green entrance).  Accessible from both directions of the highway.

CAPE TOWN - Noordhoek - Monkey Valley resort
DATE: Sunday - 2 December 2012
TIME: 11am - 1pm
VENUE: Monkey Valley Resort - Noordhoek - 1 Mountain Drive - Opposite Red Herring - Just before the long beach parking area below Chapman's Peak.

Monday, 19 November 2012

UBUNTU Public Meetings in November 2012


Public meeting events for November 2012

No bookings – just arrive – entrance is FREE - Tell Everyone

UBUNTU Party Launch & Opening of UBUNTU Community Centre, Waterval Boven, Mpumalanga
DATE: Saturday - 24 November 2012
TIME: 12 noon – 3pm
VENUE:  UBUNTU Community Village, 17 Zasm Road, Waterval Boven, Mpumalanga
(As you enter Waterval Boven, drive down the hill, over the river, and turn immediately left into Zasm Road before Rail Bridge).

UBUNTU Party Launch and Public Meeting in West Rand Johannesburg, Muldersdrift, Gauteng
DATE: Sunday - 25 November 2012
TIME: 2pm – 5pm
VENUE:  Bergvallei Estates, Muldersdrift, just off the N14
GPS:      S26 degrees 03 minutes 14.1 seconds        E027 degrees 50 minutes 16.9 seconds
Please note that Bergvallei is on the R28/N14 and there is thus a service road  - it is not a slipway, but you turn off onto the service road directly off of the highway, almost immediately after you have seen the entrance to Bergvallei (prominent white and green entrance).  Accessible from both directions)

Come listen to an inspiring presentation of HOPE and REAL FREEDOM by founder Michael Tellinger
We will discuss the launch of many COMMUNITY PROJECTS to benefit all the people. 

Abundance For All – NOW!

We, the people, have appointed the government as our servants to do the best for us – THEY ARE NOT SERVING US – THEY ARE SERVING THEMSELVES. They have betrayed the dream of Nelson Mandela and other elders of integrity who dedicated their lives to our freedom. South Africa is one of the wealthiest countries of the world and yet we have more poverty, more hunger, more despair, more misery than ever before in our history. Only we – the people, can change this.

Our Inalienable Rights – The Rights of All People
  1.     The country belongs to its people  - The land belongs to the people
  2.     The water, the rivers and lakes belong to the people
  3.     The beaches and the oceans around us belong to the people
  4.     The forests, the mountains, the skies above and the airwaves belong to the people
  5.     All the minerals in the ground belong to the people - gold, the platinum, chrome, copper, iron, tin, aluminium, diamonds, coal and all others
These do not belong to the government or any other corporation that has unlawfully laid claim to it.
The UBUNTU Liberation Movement and political PARTY  presents a solid foundation for a new social structure into a new era of real freedom from economic slavery, and into real prosperity. Our philosophy is based on the principles of absolute equality, decentralised power, creating abundance for all, traditional African values, honouring our ancestors, and Unity Consciousness. 


See our website and join us today – Our strength is in unity:

“Africa was once great. Let us make her great Again.” African Elder - Baba Sanusi, Credo Mutwa

Sunday, 18 November 2012

STD Bank Lies To The People - Refuses To Answer Questions

Derry Burge is a debt management consultant. Dozens of consultants like Derry are being undermined by banksters who break their code of conduct as outlined by the National Credit Act and other codes that govern their activity.
This is a letter to Joop Dekker of Standard Bank, on behalf of Derry's client. Joop is the head of complaints in the office of the CEO, Jacko Maree. In the past, Joop Dekker made a statement to me, that he is the authorised representative of the CEO to deal with all complaints, and therefore "his words and sentiments are those of the CEO", or something close to that. I trust that this will still come back to bite him. Banks are foreclosing on people and selling their homes for shortfalls of a few hundred Rand in some cases. This is immoral, inhumane and unlawful, since they do not have any claim to your home, after the process of securitisation. 
The UBUNTU Party together with the support of groups like New ERA will continue to expose the banksters until our judges wake up and do what they are supposed to do - serve the people and deliver justice to the people.
Joop Dekker is currently spreading misinformation and blatantly lying to many people who have demanded answers to simple questions they are entitled to. This kind of response from the bank may be applicable to millions of people in SA. Please familiarise yourself with this. It all helps us to understand the beast. This email is posted with permission of Derry Burge.
Michael Tellinger

Gooday Joop
I am proudly a member of the NEW ERA as well as their union. I am absolutely ecstatic as a member to be able to finally ask these questions, on areas that I have so much more clarity on now, that NEED to be answered and a consumer has a right to ask. Why you have such a defensive approach to responding to them is unclear to me.

If the banks were as transparent as they make out to be, it should be a simple case of replying to them in a very short space of time without alleging that I am being mislead. On the contrary it is the banks that are misleading the consumers and the time has come to expose this. The biggest problem facing DC’s is the lack of knowledge that the staff appear to have when addressed with these questions. Is there a reason that the staff do not know what securitisation is?

I proudly stand up and join this fight for the Constitutional Rights afforded in this country to all citizens and the protection provided by the NCA and the Consumer Protection Act.

To state that the questions are inappropriate leads me to believe that the bank does not want to answer them, why?

This consumer has never skipped a payment as per attachment and the R750 Consent Order fee is to be found on the NCR website – if you wish for an invoice I will provide it.

It appears petty and prejudicial to want to take somebody’s home away from them as you allege that just over R1000 was short paid under debt review.

When a bank gets to the stage of taking away a person’s house for reasons given above, it is a very sad day for me and those who support debt review – like COSATU, The DCI and the UBUNTU Party as well as the NCR who strive to ensure that the previously disadvantaged are protected – but you prefer to issue summons on someone under debt review who clearly will be unable to afford a attorney to defend her. Then after repossessing her house, guaranteed there will be a shortfall further discriminating against her by passing a judgement – ensuring that she will never be able to own a house again – where is the logic in this? Has the bank so much money to spend on attorneys over issues like this which could be solved by one phone call – the termination letter was not even sent to me and the e-mail address is totally unknown to me – so I cannot acknowledge termination as I will only accept an 86(10) by registered mail – held up by the Magistrates Court Rules.

Standard Bank is notorious for securitisation of bonds to Blue granite (1,2,3 etc) and it is in the spirit of transparency and fairness to the consumer that I am ENTITLED to ask this question due to the prevalence of this practice.

I am more concerned about the banks lack of interest or even knowledge when asked questions that are pertinent.

Then the banks want us DC’s to use the NDMA –in good faith? This is surely not applicable here and the very reason I feel that the NDMA should be dis-bandoned – if I had worked through the NDMA complaints system, what response would I then have got on this petty amount outstanding?

There is NO leverage when trying to get assistance to help consumers when dealing with your attorneys. They are all wearing blinkers and have no lateral thinking. Surely if a proposal was made they should come back to you for a response before issuing a summons to see if we can meet on even ground?  Or is it a matter of the attorneys milking the banks, no matter the outcome to the consumer?

Again as per attached documents – are you still going to proceed with High Court action or allow for negotiations to assist this woman in keeping her property.

I eagerly await your response.

Derry Burge

Friday, 16 November 2012

The Roads Belong to The People

Letter to Jacob Zuma and the government of South Africa


The UBUNTU Party is fundamentally and completely opposed to the introduction of the e-toll system on the roads of Gauteng and /or any other toll-gate activity in South Africa.

We will continue to oppose all existing, and all proposed tolling systems on the roads of South Africa. We trust that the people will continue to rise up against your unlawful actions.

The roads belong to the people - they are not yours to sell.

Your actions have caused great hardship and separation between communities and you have prevented ordinary people from travelling throughout their country as they need. South Africa does not belong to the government or the corporations that keep the government in place. The country belongs to the people. It does not belong to the government or any other private corporation that has unlawfully laid claim to it.

This leads us to the conclusion that the government has unlawfully stolen our roads from the people and sold them to private corporations and foreign shareholders, allowing them to unlawfully hijack our people on the roads and extort money from them.

This is in complete contravention of our Bill of Rights that gives us the freedom to travel in our own country without restriction.

Our government must serve the people, and not serve themselves and/or multinational corporations who seem to control them with financial muscle. The UBUNTU Party urges the people of South Africa to realise that our government has betrayed the people and continuously creates new laws that restrict the rights of the people while enriching the corporations.

And if the government is not serving the people – it must be replaced by the people. It is time for the people to realise that the government is not our friend but our slave master.

In pure truth

Michael of the family Tellinger (born free - enslaved by a corrupt system)
UBUNTU Party Founder


Wednesday, 14 November 2012

10 Critical Questions to Ask Your Bank

If you want to understand how the banksters are deceitfully pulling the wool over all our eyes please go to the NewERA website and read the document called "Securitisation - Conspiracy of Silence" which is spreading through the Internet like wildfire.
Thanks to this document, people from all over South Africa are demanding that their bank tell them the truth. What is absolutely unbelievable, is that the banks are refusing to answer these 10 simple questions. 

These are brilliantly structured to expose the banks, if they are answered - that is why they will NOT answer these questions, because that would immediately implicate them in a number of unlawful and fraudulent activities. Starting by lying to you - which is what they have been doing in at least three Supreme Court hearings in which members of the UBUNTU Party were involved.

We urge you to send these questions to your banks and demand a response within 7 days. You will find that they immediately hand you over to their external legal department, breaching client confidentiality in the process. 

10 Critical Questions To Ask Your Bank Today

1.    Am I indebted to the bank right now? (Please answer yes or no).
2.    Please confirm that the bank actually possessed the money they claim to have lent me, prior to my loan being granted. In other words, did the bank physically have the money they lent me, prior to the money appearing in my account?
3.    Would the bank be prepared to amend the credit agreement as follows: “We, the bank, did in fact possess the money we loaned you, prior to the loan being approved.”
4.    Was the loan funded by assets belonging to the bank at the time the loan was granted? Either way, please describe in detail the accounting process used to create my loan.
5.    Did the bank record my promissory note / negotiable instrument as an asset on its books? If yes, how was my instrument used to create my loan, and where is my valuable promissory note / negotiable instrument now?
6.    Does the bank participate in a securitisation scheme whereby debts / promissory notes are bundled and then sold-on to a third party/parties via special purpose vehicles, entities or alike processes?
7.    Was my loan securitised? If so, please send me all details regarding the securitisation.
8.    Does the bank have a legal right to collect money it claims I owe it? If so, then were does this legal right come from, assuming the loan has been securitised?
9.    Has my loan with the bank been settled by a special purpose vehicle, insurance policy, or by any other party?
10.    Regarding the security given to the bank by me, has this security been sold on or given as security to another party?

NewERA is preparing a High Court Application (interdict) to prevent bank collections taken against their members. The UBUNTU Party urges everyone to join NewERA in this action and make history in taking back our economic freedom from the unlawful banskters who have been destroying people’s lives with impunity.

The banks cannot be allowed to stick their head in the sand and pretend that this R30 billion per month securitisation industry simply does not exist. While we at the UBUNTU Party are preparing our case to launch full criminal charges against the banks, we support the New Economic Rights Alliance in their proposed interdict against all SA banks, to stop all repossessions and auctions of properties until our arguments have been heard in a full trial that will expose the unlawful and fraudulent activities of the banksters.

To join the High Court interdict, and possibly protect your assets against economic hardship, please go to

Special Note: Some banks are telling their customers that NewERA is “misleading them.” If so, then surely the banks will happily answer all your questions?


Michael of the family Tellinger

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Letter to Helen Zille - 31 October 2012.

Acting Judge President Allegedly Interferes in Historic Judgement Against Banks.

I trust that with your influence in the Cape, you will be able to urgently intervene in this matter by Friday 2nd November 2012. 

From: Michael Tellinger
Founder of the UBUNTU Liberation Movement & UBUNTU Party               

The information in this press release is compiled with our best intentions and to the best of our ability stating all the facts as we have been able to obtain under very strange and mysterious circumstances in our attempts to find a critical missing court file containing an historic judgement against the banks in South Africa.
-    During the week of 10 October 2012, Acting Judge Kirk-Cohen in the Cape Town High Court handed down judgement against First National Bank, in favour of the defendant, who wants to remain anonymous at this stage.
-    The judgement was based on the argument of securitisation of the defendant’s home, in which the bank lose all its rights to the property, and therefore cannot execute it, or even begin any legal proceedings of such nature because they lost the legal standing to do so.
-    The case numbers are 6579/12 and 17374/12.
-    This judgment was spawned by two counts of contempt of court by FNB refusing to comply with two court orders.
-    This judgment has the capacity to change the lives of all people in South Africa forever, and remove the financial hardship that we have all been unlawfully plunged in to by the actions of the banks.
-    This has ramifications for the entire banking system.
-    Judgments like this have been handed down overseas in favour of the homeowner.
-    For some strange reason, the judgment and the entire court file is not forthcoming and as of today is still unavailable to the public.
-    The Ubuntu Party has a vested interest in this case since it represents several thousand people who are equally affected by this judgement – as is everyone else in South Africa.
-    The UBUNTU Party was informed yesterday that the case/file had been directed to the office of the Acting Judge President Traverso.
-    The defendants Counsel was not aware of this.
-    In fact, if not for the investigative work of the Ubuntu Party, he would never have known that the file was with Traverso and would have continued searching for it.
-    Counsel for the home owner met with Traverso this morning, who confirmed that she does have the file, and informed him that the file would not become available until this coming Friday, 2nd November 2012.
-    Traverso was allegedly instrumental in arranging security at the defendants house, without his knowledge.
-    A strange security person had entered the defendant’s residence while he was away on business, and made himself at home – without any knowledge or consultation with the home owner at all.
-    Traverso has allegedly instructed FNB that they have rights, and have until Friday 2 November to file some form of final legal argument.
-    Traverso’s son-in-law, Paul Finlayson is the Managing Director of Nedbank Private Wealth.
-    At around 16:30 on Wednesday, 31 October, we were informed that the file has been handed to Judge President Hlope – reasons unknown.
-    Helen Zilla has been notified that this is a matter of the highest public interest and asked to use her influence to intervene.
-    The Ubuntu Party has been following this case for some time and would like an immediate investigation into the disappearance of the judgement and the legal reasoning behind the action taken by Traverso.
-    This information has been extremely difficult to obtain and cannot be verified until Judge Traverso makes a public statement and full disclosure regarding the whereabouts of the file and its legal status.

There have been some dramatic developments after our legal advisor and mentor, Raymondt Dicks was attacked in his home office on 20 Oct 2012,in a military style precision hit by well trained men, that seemed to have been aided by police vehicles with flashing lights, as indicated in the security video footage, allowing the intruders’ vehicles the freedom to perpetrate the assault.He was tied up for more than 3 hours, constantly beaten and interrogatedwith repeated threats that he was going to be killed,
They knew exactly what they were doing as they carefullyremoved his computer, and all backups, our documents and more. This was the “nerve centre” of the UBUNTU Party and it has affected us much more than we originally imagined. The amount of work that Raymondt Dicks has done, and the research he had compiled against the banks is simply spectacular. The next day, only three sets of legal documents were found to be missing.  Those of the UBUNTU Party,Michael Tellinger, and New ERA, which is active in major legal action against banks and represents around 160,000 people.
All of this was captured on security cameras and the footage is ready to be released onto YouTube imminently. As of today Carte Blanche has been in contact with us and is consideringto expose this story.The Star Newspaperconfirmed that they had several dozen calls from other people who have had similar organised hits on them in the past, that seem to have been aided by rogue groups of police officers, during which legal documents were taken and lives where threatened. A senior journalist at The Star told me that they are doing a full investigation and hope to publish a detailed article on this serious issue.
VICTORY NONETHELESS:But, there have been 3 small victories in the past 2 weeks that have given our actions a great deal of traction as legal precedents. They also however indicate how incredibly cunning the banksters are in their actions – all three cases where withdrawn and/or abandoned against three individuals arguing similar cases to ours. This means that there is no judgement; no actual legal case precedent, except that they withdrew unconditionally. It does however presents us with a strong argument that something fishy is going on and that the banks do not want this heard in the courts. They have been very good at delaying tactics to date, using court rules and technicalities to win their cases without any real scrutiny by the courts – forcing ordinary people to run out of money and not be able to continue with legal proceedings against the mighty banks.
THE BIG CASE: There is one MAJOR case in Cape Town – case numbers 6579/12 & 17374/12 where during the week of 10 October 2012, a judgement was handed down by Judge Kirk-Cohen against First National Bank – in favour of the defendant who wants to remain nameless until this Friday. The judge allegedly stated to the lawyer of the defendant “you have opened Pandora’s box”.
This has now turned into the most sensitive case in SA history regarding banking. This is the straw that will break the camel’s back and force banks to rethink their business models that have been exposed to be fraudulent and highly corrupt. The judgement is based on the same arguments that our members and myself have presented in various courts, only to be laughed at, treated with a complete lack of respect, have our rights desecrated by the Constitutional Court, and even threatened that we are “wasting the court’s time” with our actions, as was the case in the judgement handed down against me. This is all about to change, once the missing file and Judgement can be located and exposed to the people.
We have been waiting for this physical judgement and papers for 3 weeks. But once again we have discovered how cunning, dirty and unscrupulous the banksters are. While completely ignoring the High Court judgement, and not complying with the court order, we suspect that they have been trying to influence the outcome in various ways at the highest level of the court and legal system in South Africa.  So much so, that the Acting Judge President, Jeanette Traverso, has taken the file into her chambers for safekeeping to avoid anyone tampering with it. That is what she claims according to our information. According to her, there is huge interest in this case. How could this be when the information regarding this case is not available and the file is missing? So who is interested in this case behind the scenes?
We have been informed and it needs to be pointed out, is that Judge Traverso has been involved as a judge in many liquidation cases where majority of the judgements she handed down have gone in favour of the banks. The case we are referring to here is now a matter of public domain and is of extreme interest and should be disclosed and exposed for all to see immediately, instead of being hidden or protected by the Acting Judge President in her chambers.
If all of this is accurate and true, The UBUNTU Party demands that Acting Judge President Traverso explains why she has intervened in this particular case and why she has taken it upon herself to give the bank additional opportunity until this Friday, 2nd Nov 2012, to argue or attempt to overturn the judgement, without notifying the defendant’s attorneys and outlining her reasons for her actions. We find her actions highly questionable.
This matter is of extreme public interest in view of the millions of people who have lost everything as a result of countless unjust judgements in the past, by our courts, handed down by ill-informed judges, who have ignorantly upheld an unjust system in favour of corrupt banksters that have been getting away with fraud and extortion for years.
Unbeknown to the defendant, Judge Traverso had allegedly arranged for security to be placed at his home. Without his knowledge or consent, a private security specialist has entered his home while he was away on business and made himself at home – taking showers and behaving as if this was his house.
This is highly irregular and suspicious behaviour – especially when taking into account that her son in law, Paul Finlayson, is the MD of BOE Private Clients Division.
It is simply unimaginable that the Acting Judge President would be so partial towards the bank and choose to protect the bank, after a very clear judgement against them, where in the past 2 weeks, since the judgement has been served by the Sheriff, they have made no effort to act against it through normal legal channels.
It is unimaginable why the Acting Judge President is giving the bank such undeserved liberty, freedom, and time to try and reverse this judgement, instead of simply enforcing it – like she has done to so many ordinary peoplewhose lives were destroyed in the process.
If this is all true, Traverso has clearly shown her stance of impartiality, because such liberty is never granted or extended towards the common people. Every day thousands of judgements are handed down by the courts in favour of banks, to execute people’s property and destroy their lives. Judges never take it upon themselves to intervene in favour of the people. This is a clear indication that corporations carry much more weight and favour with our courts and judges than human beings do.
We urge Judge Traverso to find this file, wherever it is being hidden, and release the judgement and file into the public domain where it belongs for the benefit of all the people.
The UBUNTU Party believes that this judgement will truly be the breaking point and the end of the road for the banks in exposing their fraudulent actions against each and every one of us.


Michael of the family Tellinger.

Email to Judge Kirk-Cohen

Email to Acting Judge Kirk-Cohen – 1 Nov 2012

Good day
We were notified by Gary Newmark and his client Peter Osborne that you handed down a judgement against FNB in the week of the 10th October 2012. All our efforts to find any evidence of this have so far been unsuccessful. We have had very confusing  and worrying feedback about the whereabouts of the file and the judgement, that should by now be in the public domain. We at the UBUNTU Party represent several thousand people who have a vested interest in this case and its outcome, as do the rest of the people in South Africa.
Please can you urgently confirm the following so that we can make an informed public statement in the midst of various other reports that are at this stage merely speculative.
1)    Did you hand down a judgement in favour of Peter Osborn against FNB?
2)    What was the date of the judgement?
3)    What is the case number?
4)    Where is the file at present?
5)    Why has it not been made available to the public for review?
6)    Is there any truth to the reports that Acting Judge President Traverso has intervened in this matter and is in possession of the file?
7)    Has Traverso opened the door for FNB to submit additional argument to allow them to overturn the judgement?
8)    When can we get a copy of the judgement?
I trust you already appreciate the extreme sensitivity and urgency of this case, that will have an irreversible affect on banking in South Africa, and I hope to hear from you on this case as a matter of urgency.
In pure truth
Michael Tellinger
UBUNTU Party Leader